Showing posts with label water holding capacity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label water holding capacity. Show all posts

Thursday, 3 September 2020

So, What is Soil Moisture

 

I recently heard a gardening segment on a NZ radio station. The gardening commentator was answering questions and providing advice on ‘how to irrigate your garden’. Her advice was: “Deep watering will encourage the roots to grow into the water table below. This is desirable as it allows the plants to be self-sufficient in accessing water.”

We all have our own perception of water and how it is stored in the soil, but the gardening commentator’s description isn’t an accurate description of what actually happens within the soil or what we are aiming to achieve through irrigation.

There are several processes at play when water is “stored” in the soil: 

·        cohesion - the attraction of water molecules (H2O) to one another it causes water molecules to stick to one another and form water droplets;

·        adhesion – the attraction between water molecules and solid surfaces, in this case soil particles;

·        surface tension – as a result of the cohesive properties of water molecules and their attraction to other water molecules, a water surface behaves like an expandable film; and

·        capillarity – is a combination of cohesion/adhesion and surface tension forces and is the primary force that enables the soil to retain water and to regulate its movement.

In this article we will take a closer look at these terms and and apply the concepts to soil moisture storage.

To demonstrate or understand adhesion and cohesion, pick up a rock or stone, dip it into a pool of water, pull it out again. The water dripping off the rock is free water (lost to gravity, same as free water will be lost to drainage when soil is at saturation point). If you give the rock a shake you will free it of more water - this is the water “stored” by cohesion. The rock is still wet even after the shaking - the water left on the rock is “stored” by adhesion (Figure 1). Water is stored in this way on all soil particle surfaces, whether it be a clay, silt, sand or gravel particle.

Figure 1 Soil moisture is stored on soil particles like a film via adhesion. On this stone adhesion is demonstrated by dipping it into water solution containing blue dye.

Figure 1: Soil moisture is stored on soil particles like a film via adhesion. On this stone adhesion is demonstrated by dipping it into water solution containing blue dye.

Capillarity is the key to storage of water in the soil. It allows water to move upward (and through) soil pores against the force of gravity. The finer-textured the soil (silts and clays) the greater the ability to hold and retain water in the soil in the spaces between particles. The pores between small silt (less than 0.02mm diameter) and tiny clay (less than 0.002mm diameter) particles are known as micropores. Compare these to the larger pore spacing between larger particles, such as sand (0.2-2mm) and stones (larger than 2mm) which are called macropores. Micropores enable greater capillarity rise.

Capillarity can also be simply demonstrated by placing a dry sponge into water – it will progressively wet upwards through the sponge (Figure 2). The finer the sponge material the higher the water will wet the sponge.


Figure 2: Fine sponge placed into a dish with water solution containing blue dye demonstrating capillarity.

When we irrigate, we want the water to have the opportunity for adhesion and capillarity to take place; i.e. “coat” the soil particle surfaces with water and be retained in the micro pores by capillarity this is best achieved through low application rates and by matching the applied depth to soil moisture deficit.

Back to the garden commentator’s recommendation to practice deep watering and aim to push roots into a water table. Very few farmers/growers/irrigators will have a water table shallow enough for roots to reach the water table. When roots explore the soil profile, they form perfect contact with soil particles, via this contact they can extract the moisture stored on particle surfaces. Deep watering is accurate to an extent. We want roots to explore as much soil as possible as this allows them to access more water and nutrients. Roots will only grow in moist soil, so they’ll only explore the soil profile if it’s been wetted. However, it is unusual for the subsoil not to be moist enough for root growth as the plant advances through its growth stages. Irrigation should therefore only be aimed at wetting the soil within the active root zone.

Aquacheck sensors measure soil moisture at several depths. This depth profile is a very useful tool in managing your irrigation. It allows you to see if you are wetting the active root zone and whether the subsoil is wet enough to allow for root growth.

Jane Robb 

Vantage NZ Customer Support Specialist


Thursday, 3 May 2018

EM Values - What the data is telling you

Today we've got the second part of a 4 part series on EM Surveying and all it's uses. This week we've been into the EM Surveying over on the West Coast (check out our Facebook page if you want to see more) and it's certainly an important part of the job being out there doing the survey and seeing the physical aspects of the job to help make sense of the data and what it's telling you. Today we look at what the EM data does tell you...

An electro-magnetic (EM) sensor generates a constant electro-magnetic field that penetrates into the soil profile. It measures the bulk electrical conductivity of the soil profile. As we conduct an EM survey the sensor is taking readings at two different depths simultaneously. These two depths are known as the ‘Shallow EM’ and the ‘Deep EM’. The depths the DualEM reads depends on the height the machine is off the ground. With our EM setup we are reading the soil profile depth of 0-50cm for the shallow EM and the deep EM at a soil profile of 0-125cm. So the deep EM values are the same as the shallow plus another 75cm deeper. This is why the deep EM readings are always higher than the shallow as it is reading that extra 5cm.
Figure 1: Shallow EM survey values varying from 2-20 EM units (mS/m)

Figure 2: Deep EM of the same area with values ranging from 14-30 EM units (mS/m)
In this survey the same features are showing in the shallow EM and deep EM results, however sometimes this is not always the case the deeper profile can have a different underlying soil type that the shallow EM doesn’t pick up but the extra 85cm of deeper soil does and it changes the overall structure.


Generally speaking and depending on what part of the country you are in and the time of year the survey is carried out amongst other things, we would class a range in EM in the shallow profile of 1-3 units as low variability, 4-8 units as moderate variability and over 8 units range as high variability in the shallow layer/soil profile. In the deep EM/soil profile layer a range of 1-6 would be low variability, 6-15 moderate variability and over that high. It is often dangerous to generalise like that, but it gives you an idea of the type of ranges we look at, and as previously stated there are a lot of other factories that determine if the readings are low, medium or high variability. You also have to look at the distribution of the values as well, if the majority of the values are within a certain range and a few rogue values outside that but on a minimal area of the total, then the range in variation may not be as much as it first looks. How much the variability is costing you in terms of blanket irrigation applications compared to variable rate irrigation applications be it water, seed or fertilizer is a subject for another day!

For more information on EM Surveying please contact us at Agri Optics NZ Ltd.


Chris Smith.facebook

Thursday, 26 April 2018

EM Surveying - it's that time of year again!

With all the early season rainfall we've had the EM Surveying season has started a lot earlier than most years. It's great in a couple of respects: 1) we can get across the ground before it all gets really wet (if that happens) and the potential to make a mess increases and 2) it gives you more time to analyse and incorporate the data into your decision making over the winter months. 

As we're already into it this year, we thought it was time to give you a reminder about EM Surveying and how it all works. Today you'll get the first of a two part blog looking at the process, what you get from an EM Survey and what it can all be used for. 

EM Survey – Part 1 - the process.

When we conduct an EM survey we are measuring the electrically conductivity within the soil profile, the values have close links to the soil texture properties, where clay gives a higher reading than silt that in turn gives a higher reading than sand. So, by driving over a block of land you pick up the differences in the soil texture at two different depths 0-50cm and 0-125cm. Other factors have varying degrees of influence on the readings such as soil bulk density and moisture within the profile at the time of the survey. High salinity readings can have a huge influence on readings, but this is only in specific areas of New Zealand. The EM data is logged using 2cm accurate RTK GPS, so not only do we map the relative changes in soil texture, we are also collecting valuable topography data at the same time.

Agri Optics' EM Survey setup with soil profile shown. The measurements penetrate 1.25m into the ground. 

We drive most commonly at 12m swaths across the area, but closer resolution can be used for more intensive situations such as viticulture. Once the survey has been conducted we write a report about the findings from the two different EM layers, we then zone the EM data up into different management areas and run topography generated maps. Once you have had time to read through the report we arrange a meeting to then run through the report with you in person if you so desire. We also supply the client with software to view the data on their own computers and look at the different layers plus make your own management zones if required. From this point we can then focus on the areas of interest for your requirements.

The survey data has many uses, depending on the farming type and location and includes but is not limited to the following;  being the basis of variable rate irrigation application maps, moisture probe placement, used in zonal soil sampling, in dryland farming areas knowing where to put your effluent, to varying your nitrogen use depending on the underling soil types and used for flood modelling. It can also be used in conjunction with other layers of data such as yield maps, biomass maps and as happens frequency used with the topography data. Over the next few blogs I can drill into more detail on these different uses.

The EM season runs form the end of irrigation in the autumn through to Spring, but from now onwards is the ideal timing. For more information on EM surveying or to book one in for this season, please contact one of the Agri Optics team. Cheers, Chris. 

Monday, 18 September 2017

Tips, Tools and Technology for Efficient Farming - Part 1

During winter the H2Grow team ran a series of workshops throughout the South Island titled ‘Tips, Tools and Technology for Efficient Farming’. These workshops were very well attended and the team thoroughly enjoyed meeting everyone and the wide-ranging discussions that were had.

For those that were unable to attend we do not want you to miss out, so over the next few blog posts we will be posting notes of the key messages from each of the presentations. These are only condensed versions of the main points so if you would like further information or have any questions then please do feel free to contact the contributors directly by either clicking on the photo widgets to the right of this blog, or use the links provided.

The first set of presentation notes briefly cover the following topics:
  1. Why should we care about farming efficiently?
    • Nutrient management - why are we doing this?
    • Irrigation and nutrient management - how to they fit together?
  2. Soil moisture and water use efficiency
You will see there are two copies of the notes, one for Canterbury and the other for Otago as the notes relating to the regulations between these two areas differs.


Both topics were presented by Irricon Resource Solutions, so for more information please fee free to contact Keri Johnston or a member of the Irricon Team.



Thursday, 15 June 2017

'Tips, Tools & Technology for Efficient Farming' - Workshop Series

Do you want to improve the nutrient and irrigation management on your farm but are not sure where to start? Come along to a free 'Tips, Tools & Technology for Efficient Farming' workshop jointly hosted by Lindsay NZ, Agri Optics New Zealand Ltd and Irricon Resource Solutions.

Over the course of the workshop we'll cover off a range of topics from nutrient management, irrigation management and hardware, precision agriculture and how these all tie in with farm environment plans for efficient farming.



Please use this link to register - Register me for a workshop please!

We look forward to seeing you there

Monday, 13 February 2017

Why my soil moisture sensor might be lying to me?

After choosing the type of moisture sensor you are going to invest in, the most crucial thing is to get the installation correct. It goes back to the old adage; rubbish in rubbish out, if you don’t get the installation correct everything that follows will at best be very marginal data.

Most probes are measuring a very small volume of soil within 10-20mm of the sensor itself, so good soil contact is imperative as well as a crop cover around the probe that is representative of the rest of the field being monitored.

If you are looking at installing a probe for next season or looking at maintenance on an existing probe then read on! These few basic does and don’ts will be of good use!

Don’t!

  • Don't leave the excess cables on the ground – it is an accident waiting to happen!
  • Don’t leave exposed cables for wildlife that want to see how tasty it is!
  • Don’t site the probe on a ridge or in a hollow!
  • Don’t site the probe in bare soil. Is there a crop growing over the probe site to give you a true representation of what is happening in the rest of the field? 
  • Don’t site under the fence line
Don't leave cables on the ground
Do!

  • Ensure you use good consistency of slurry around the probe to ensure good soil contact.
  • Ensure you know the soil type your moisture sensor is located in and how that compares to the rest of the area you are monitoring.
  • Make sure any tramlines or irrigation tracks miss the probe site by metres rather than millimetres!
  • If your probe is near an electric fence, do ensure any metalwork is earthed.
  • Do install the probe as early in the season as you can, so it has time to bed in and the crop over the top of it time to establish like the rest of the field.
  • Do ensure a competent and trained person installs the probe with the right equipment to do so!
  • If checking an old installation make sure there are no cracks around the probe site, the soil around the probe hasn’t sunk and the wires are in good order.

AquaLINK telemetry unit, away from AquaCheck probe out in the paddock
If you have any doubts about the site or installation of your probe, by installing it as early in the season as you can means that it can be moved and still have the winter to bed in again.
AquaCheck WEB, induvial sensor graph responding to irrigation and rain events.
Monitor your probe data and its response to rain or irrigation events, the beauty of the capacitance probes is that moving them is not an issue.

This article contains information from a post previously written by HydroServices but has been updated to include the experience from the Agri Optics team installing AquaCheck probes.

Thursday, 19 January 2017

A Guide to Making Sense of Soil Moisture Data

With an increasing amount of soil moisture monitoring sensors on offer in the market today there is growing importance on not only having sensors installed but actually understanding the information they provide. This blog is written to give some insight into the data they you might receive from one of these devices. The following traces are the output of an AquaCheck soil moisture sensor with 3G telemetry. The sensors measure soil moisture and temperature every 30 minutes. The data is available to Agri Optics clients from the AquaCheckWeb platform. For more info see our website http://www.agrioptics.co.nz/portfolio/aquacheck/

The key to getting the most out of your soil moisture sensor is to have an accurate field capacity (FC) and refill point for the probe site calculated. The most convenient way of identifying Field Capacity is to have the probe installed prior to the winter period. Typically there will be enough precipitation to allow the profile to recharge to FC. FC can also be identified by saturating the profile manually with a large quantity of water. The key points we are looking for when identifying FC is a repeated filling to saturation then drainage of the profile. The point where drainage ceases can be identified as FC. Night time events are more accurate as ET is not a factor.
Fig 1. Identifying field capacity
The next key feature to identify is drainage. Drainage is classified as the loss of soil water past the effective rooting zone. The effective rooting zone varies dependent on the crop. Once the depth of plant roots has been identified we can identify any drainage. For the graph below if the crop has a rooting depth of 600mm. The bottom pink line represents the sensor at 600mm. We can see the lift and subsequent drainage of soil water past the effective rooting zone of 600mm.

Fig 2. Drainage events
The third key piece of information that the AquaCheck package provides is the ability to set variable management allowable deficit (MAD) lines. These lines create the target “Green Zone” typically between 85% and 15% of readily available water (RAW). Using MAD lines leaves room for any rain so that any free rain water is not wasted as drainage. It also gives an indication when soil moisture is approaching stress point. The MAD is able to be adjusted to give a desired target soil moisture zone for crop and pasture growth stages e.g. establishment or harvest.
Fig 3. MAD Lines
The final bit of information that becomes available once the crop starts growing is the daily soil water usage. The staircase like moisture trace is showing us evapotranspiration and it allows us to see the impact that increasing crop biomass and increasing temperatures are having on crop or pasture water usage. Crop rooting depth can be identified by seeing how far down the water usage is occurring. In fig 2. above below the roots are drawing moisture down to 600mm vs a later spring sown wheat in fig 4. which is only drawing water to 400. Note the size of the usages. This relates to the root mass at the given depths.
Fig 4. Crop water usage
I hope these tips are useful when interpreting your soil moisture data and that it results in more efficient scheduling of your irrigation this summer. Irrigation New Zealand also has some more tips and info on their website http://irrigationnz.co.nz/news-resources/irrigation-resources/

Post By Nick



Monday, 12 December 2016

Know your Soil Better than your Bank Manager - Continued

Identifying Soil Texture


Soils are made up of particles of different sizes, the largest sand, followed by silt, to the smallest clays. Together these make up the soil’s texture. Soil texture has a direct impact on soil physical properties: porosity, water holding capacity and bulk density. Furthermore soil clay content determines soil chemical properties and the soil’s ability to hold onto nutrients.

This blog will discuss hands on ways to determine your soil texture, how texture relates to key soil physical properties and the role of clays in the soil. You can determine your soil texture at the same time as you carry out the VSA described in the previous blog post and together these practices will improve the quality of your information.

The change in a soil with depth, the cross section down through the soil, is referred to as the soil profile. It normally consists of a number of soil horizons (layers) each with different characteristics (texture and/or stone content). The picture below shows a soil profile with six distinct soil horizons. When scheduling irrigation you need to know information about the hydraulic (water) properties of each soil horizon that plant roots occupy within the soil profile to determine the amount of water available to the plant. This determines how frequently you need to irrigate (return period) and the maximum irrigation you can apply in one application (irrigation depth).

Example soil profile
Soil texture is an important characteristic because it gives a good indication of other soil properties such as water storage, drainage and nutrient supply. It is a stable soil property and is not likely to change with normal soil management. Soil texture can be estimated in the field by some practical tests involving the feel of the soil and these are outlined below. To determine the textures and get an idea for the ability of your soil to hold water it is beneficial to dig a pit and expose an open face on the soil profile so you can determine the different horizons visible down the profile. You should identify the soil texture of each of the horizons that plant roots are found to grow in, or down to about 60 cm.

Hands on method to determine your soil texture.
Found in the joint Irrigation NZ and Plant and Food resource - Click here to visit the webpage.

The graph below shows typical soil water holding capacities (WHC) for different soil textures in % or mm of water per 100 mm of soil depth. It also shows their typical permanent wilting points (WP) and field capacities (FC). The relationship between WHC, porosity and bulk density is straightforward. Sand has the largest particles, the lowest WHC and therefore the lowest porosity. This translates into the highest bulk density because less space is occupied by air. As shown by the WHC of silt and clay below, silt has a higher porosity and lower bulk density which is very similar to clay soils although clays tend to have the highest porosity. This is because clay is made up of lots of small particles which create lots of air spaces between them. Therefore clay also has the lowest values for bulk density.

Relationship between soil texture and soil water content.
Found in the joint Irrigation NZ and Plant and Food resource.
Another role of clay in the soil is in terms of nutrient management. The structure of clay's means that they tend to become negatively charged around the surface. This means that positively charged nutrients are attracted to the surface of the clay and, depending on the conditions, can move between this surface and the soil solution from where they can be taken up by plants. It is helpful to have an idea of how much clay your soil has because this will determine its ability to store positively charged nutrients such as potassium, calcium, magnesium, sodium and resist changes in pH. Clay also holds phosphorus by allowing it to be adsorbed into the clay structure; some clay's allow this more than others. This is important to note because when phosphate is adsorbed it is less likely to become available to the plant and more phosphate will need to be applied to the soil to avoid deficiency in plants.

For more information on soil texture and water holding capacity you will find a great resource by following this link.

Once you have an idea of your soil texture and water holding capacity mapping tools can be used to get an idea of the representation of this soil type across your whole farm. Simple mapping such as Google Earth images (see the Ground Truthing your Soil Variability blog) and S-Map (which will be discussed in a future blog post) are helpful resources. It is important to be aware that these are tools to increase your understanding but to provide the detail required for efficient farm management tools such as EM mapping and determining exact water holding capacity are greatly beneficial.

Blog post written by Nicole Mesman - BSc (Hons) Soil Science.

Friday, 9 December 2016

Know your Soil Better than your Bank Manager

A Practical Guide to Assessing your Soil Quality


The soil’s physical properties are vital to the ecological and economic sustainability of land. They control the movement of water and air through the soil, and the ease with which roots penetrate the soil. Damage to the soil can change these properties and reduce plant growth, regardless of nutrient status. Decline in soil physical properties takes considerable expense and many years to correct, and can increase the risk of soil erosion by water or wind.

The primary functions of the soil are to provide plants with air, water, nutrients and a rooting medium for growth and physical support (image sourced from the Landcare Research website) 
The Visual Soil Assessment (VSA) was developed by Landcare Research to give cropping and pastoral farmers a straight forward and time efficient checklist to use in the field to assess the state of their soil, primarily the physical soil quality.

The VSA can be found online here -> Visual Soil Assessment (VSA)

The VSA aims to help farmers identify changes occurring to soil physical properties so that they can assess the effect that these changes will have on their soil quality and the sustainability of their land management and long term profit.

Pictures in the VSA guide can be helpful when carrying out the assessment in the field (image sourced from: VSA Volume 1).
The assessment can be carried out quickly, reliably and cheaply with little equipment, training or technical skills. The scorecard below is to record those visual soil indicators used to assess soil quality. There is a similar scorecard for recording plant indicators. You are then able to compare the two sets of indicators to see if you have similar scores for both and if not why. For instance, is damage to soil quality not being seen in crops yet or are crops struggling to recover from previous soil damage?

VSA Scorecard (image sourced from: VSA Volume 1)
Below each indicator is a section in the online VSA booklet to refer to for assistance. Pictures are included so you can compare what you are viewing and refer to examples. You will need a spade, the score card, a surface to drop soil onto for a shatter test and a bin to contain soil. Each indicator is given a weighting and at the bottom of the scorecard you add the scores for the various indicators. Values falling within certain ranges are deemed “poor”, “moderate” and “good” quality. If your quality is poor or moderate it is suggested that you refer to Volume 2, also easily accessible from Landcare Research online. This volume contains tips on how to improve your soil quality or maintain it if it is already good.

Tips include:

  • Cultivating at the correct moisture levels to avoid smearing of soil, formation of cultivation pans and reduced infiltration when the soils are too wet. 
    (image sourced from: VSA Volume 2)
  • Use a sub-soiler to break cultivation pans and increase root growth
  • Maintain soil organic matter levels to ensure porosity, drainage and root growth.
    (image sourced from: VSA Volume 2)

By utilising these resources, you will gain a better appreciation for the state of your soil and will be able to identify when changes are occurring and why. The VSA is a simple tool and when used regularly will help with building a picture of soil quality. There are a range of other resources that can continue from the VSA, further your knowledge of your soil and assist with management. SINDI, another resource for determining soil quality, will be discussed in a future blog post along with hands on ways to identify your soil type and S-Map, how its geomorphological (land formation) history can be used to assist your farming.

The blog post you have just read was written by Nicole Mesman - BSc (Hons) Soil Science.

Wednesday, 7 December 2016

Soil Moisture 101

Soils are made up of mineral matter, organic matter, water and air. The space between the soil particles are referred to as pores, air and water occupy these pores. Macro pores allow water to filter through the soil and then drain out the bottom. Micro pores store water that is available for plants to grow.

Soil texture is an important characteristic that influences water holding capacity, drainage characteristics and water infiltration rate. The finer the texture of the soil the greater volume of micro pores and therefore greater water holding capacity compared to coarser textured soils.

The total amount of water that a soil can store is referred to as the water holding capacity (WHC) of the soil. Coarse textured soils such as sandy and gravelly soils have a low WHC while silts and clays retain more water therefore have a higher WHC. WHC is usually expressed in miilimetres (similarly to rainfall) held per depth of soil e.g. Xmm/100mm.

Here are some common terms that you are likely to come across regularly on H2Grow and resources relating to soil moisture and irrigation scheduling:

Saturation – When all the macro and micro pores are full of water. If more water is added to a saturated soil it will either drain out the bottom, pond or run-off.

Field Capacity – Macro pores are full of air, micro pores are full of water. Silt and clay soils generally reach field capacity after 2-3 days of drainage from saturation, sandy and gravelly soils much faster. Field capacity may also be referred to as full point.

Stress Point – At this point the plant has to work to harvest the water from the soil, therefore plant growth is slowed and yield potential is reduced. The plant will survive beyond this point but will become increasingly stressed. Stress point is related to crop type, rooting depth and soil type. Stress point may also be referred to as trigger point or refill point.

Wilting Point – At this point although there is still water held in the soil the plant is not able to access it as it is held to tightly (hydroscopic water). The plant will therefore permanently wilt and die. Wilting point may also be referred to as permanent wilting point.

Water Holding Capacity (WHC) – Is a measure of the water that is extractable by plants. This can be calculated by taking the difference between the soil water at field capacity and at permanent wilting point. Water holding capacity may also be referred to as total available water or available water.

Readily Available Water (RAW) – Is a measure of the amount of water in the soil that supports optimum plant growth. This can be calculated by taking the difference between field capacity and stress point. As a general rule of thumb half of the WHC is readily available to the plant, therefore RAW = 0.5 x WHC.

Soil Infiltration Rate – Is the speed at which applied water can enter the soil. It is described as the millimetres depth of water infiltrated per hour (mm/hr).

Figure 1 below may help to illustrate the difference between saturation, field capacity and wilting point.

Figure 1
While this theory is all very useful, nothing beats seeing like in the real world. So I’d encourage you the next time you’re doing a paddock walk to take a spade with you and locate what appears to be the driest and the wettest spots in a paddock. Dig a hole in these two spots and compare the soil type/texture, the depth of topsoil, depth of the roots and other obvious visual differences. You will see posts over the next month that explain how to carry out a visual soil assessment and then how to apply this in your irrigation scheduling.

Posted by Sarah Elliot from Lindsay NZ

Tuesday, 22 November 2016

Legumes + Efficient Water Use = Great Results at Omarama Station

Omarama Station recently played host to the "Legumes in the High Country" field day, organised by Lincoln University and Beef + Lamb NZ. There was a good turnout of farmers and industry professionals to the farm owned and run by Richard and Annabelle Subtil, 2015 winners of the South Island Farmer of the Year competition. The focus for the day was the use of legume species in the high country environment with a short session on the use of irrigation and soil moisture monitoring in the arid environment that is the Mackenzie Country.

Omarama Station (Courtesty of Richard Subtil)
Omarama Station covers 12,000ha with a mixture of dryland high country and irrigated flats. The property has had significant development work undertaken and a number of centre pivot irrigators installed that irrigate 560ha. A large water storage pond has been constructed to supply water to the irrigation system.

Dr MS Srinivasan from NIWA gave the first presentation for the day at the site of the lysimeter that has recently been installed on the station. The lysimeter is the first in the Waitaki catchment and aims to build knowledge around drainage and soil water under the developing soils at Omarama Station. The site contains three catchment sleeves one of which has soil moisture sensors installed. Any drainage water from the site is measured which gives an indication of the soil moisture status and how drainage from the soil profile is taking place.

From a soil moisture point of view the lysimeter is important as the soils at Omarama Station have exceptionally variable fertility, structure and water holding capacity. Irrigation is not new to the area however the shift from border-dyke irrigation to more efficient spray irrigation has seen a massive change in the water use efficiency on extensive properties such as Omarama Station. Soil development under irrigation is an interesting concept and soils mapped on Omarama Station have shown to have varying levels of water holding capacity based on how long they have been irrigated for in the past. Investigation has shown that the depth of soil and the water holding capacity has improved under 30 years of irrigation. 

Irrigation at Omarama Station (Courtesy of Richard Subtil)
Agri Optics has installed three sub-surface AquaCheck probes that will complement the work being undertaken at the lysimeter site. This information will flow into the decision making process that is used around timing and quantity of irrigation water applied by the team at Omarama Station. 

Derrick Moot spoke on how selection of species was important to maximising water use efficiency in moisture deficient environments such as the Mackenzie Basin. As we know lucerne is a great fit into dryland high country systems. It has the ability to maximise the water use efficiency and has a high water to dry matter conversion ratio (kg DM/mm/ha). The selection of species going forward and the development of novel species all points towards maximising the efficiency of water use in dry high country areas.

Write up by Nick Evans

Wednesday, 5 October 2016

Improving Irrigation Efficiency for Only $50 cont.

Here is the much anticipated second installment from the Improving Irrigation Efficiency field day run by The Waihao Wainono Group and Morven Glenavy Irrigation. Dr Anthony Davoren, renowned Irrigation Consultant with Hydroservices, shares how drainage through the soil profile can be measured. With this key piece of information we can improve our irrigation management, and know when to turn the irrigator on (or off) to ensure all irrigation that is being applied is going to benefit the grass or crops we are growing.


Thank you to Dr Anthony Davoren, Waihao Wainono Group and Morven Glenavy Irrigation.

Thursday, 29 September 2016

Improving Irrigation Efficiency for Only $50

Dr Anthony Davoren is renowned as one of New Zealand’s leading irrigation consultants, establishing Hydroservices in 1983. If you have a question about irrigation management, soil and soil water assessment or surface and groundwater water resources then Tony will have the answer. What sets Tony apart is his practical, hands-on approach and the way he communicates information in a way that farmers can easily understand and relate to… I mean how many other speakers will you find presenting from a hole in the ground!

The Waihao Wainono Group and Morven Glenavy Irrigation recently hosted a field day focusing on improving irrigation efficiency. H2Grow is lucky enough to be able to share with you some short videos from this day. In the first in this series Tony explains how the root depth of the pasture or crop you are growing should be considered when deciding on the most appropriate soil moisture measuring equipment for your property.

Considering Root Depth when Measuring your Soil Moisture Levels






Keep a look out for the next video in this series where Tony explains how to measure drainage so that you can better manage your irrigation and prevent irrigation water, and nutrients, draining through the soil... and his top tips of how to greatly improve your systems irrigation efficiency for as little as $50!

Thank you to Dr Anthony Davoren, Waihao Wainono Group and Morven Glenavy Irrigation.

Wednesday, 21 September 2016

Soil Properties Critical when Applying Effluent

Dairy effluent is a great source of nutrients for growing pasture. But if not managed properly effluent can also be a significant source of contaminants which harm our waterways. Understanding how soil properties affect nutrient loss is a key to maximising the benefits of effluent on farm and minimising its impacts on waterways.

Soil texture and structure determine the amount of water that can enter and be retained within a particular soil, and the rate of transmission of excess water through that soil. So effluent irrigation systems should be matched to soil properties to minimise runoff and leaching. The rate at which effluent can be applied to the land for maximum production benefit is determined by the soil’s properties including structure, porosity and infiltration rate.

The nature of the effluent and cattle treading on soils can affect the infiltration rate. Treading damage, which occurs most when the soils are wet, significantly reduces the infiltration rate. For some soils this can result in accumulation of effluent below slopes and in hollows. It can then enter surface waterways.

Movement of water through soil pores is generally described as hydraulic conductivity. When hydraulic conductivity of the soil is low, irrigation of effluent will result in ponding and run-off once the total water capacity of the soil is exceeded or if application rate exceeds infiltration rate.

Low rates of hydraulic conductivity are found in soils that are poorly drained, and ponding and runoff often occur with high rainfall. Many of these soils are artificially drained to reduce the incidence of ponding and water-logging, and this carries a risk that effluent can bypass the soil and be directed rapidly into waterways

Leaching occurs as excess water moves through the soil. So soils with lower water holding capacity are more susceptible to leaching, while soils with high water holding capacity (deep silt loams) can store significant quantities of effluent.

The soils that have low available water holding capacities, are the shallow to moderately deep soils, as well as sandy or stony soils. Effluent irrigation on these soils is likely to result in leaching unless it is applied at low rates and in small doses. The irrigation system on these soils must be capable of low rates of application to gain the maximum nutrient benefit.

Drainage and the level of biological activity of the soil at the application site are important. Aim to apply effluent at a rate that keeps it in the root zone so that the nutrients can be utilised by pasture.

Permeable soils with a deep water table and no drainage limits are best for putting effluent on. However, on stony soils the risk of effluent draining directly to ground water would be an issue to consider. In such situations, application depths and rates should be adjusted to account for this risk.

Another issue is "bypass flow". When effluent application rates are higher than infiltration rates, water can enter continuous macro-pores that are open at the soil surface, and then move very rapidly via so-called "bypass flow" through a relatively dry soil matrix. This means little opportunity for the water to be retained within the root zone and high leaching of nitrate is likely to occur. Bypass flow of farm dairy effluent can occur in soils that undergo shrinkage and fissuring during drying, especially when these soils have been previously compacted by treading.

Efficient effluent storage provides flexibility when it comes to application and helps maximise nutrient uptake (image: DairyNZ)
A key to avoiding over application can be having adequate effluent storage so that irrigation can be deferred if conditions aren’t right. DairyNZ has released a new smart-phone app to help farmers apply effluent more efficiently. The Dairy Effluent Spreading Calculator app provides dairy farmers and effluent spreading contractors with guidance around nutrient application rates based on the depth and type of effluent they apply.

H2Grow would like to thank Bala Tikkisetty for this blog post. Bala is a sustainable agriculture advisor at the Waikato Regional Council.

If  you are keen for further information about best practice for applying effluent you will find a raft of useful information on the Waikato Regional Council website.

Or alternatively contact Bala directly, email bala.tikkisetty@waikatoregion.govt.nz or call (freephone) 0800 800 401.

Tuesday, 2 August 2016

Reduce the Cost of Nutrient Loss with Precision Ag (Part 2 of 3)

In the last blog post we looked at nutrients and how Precision Ag can help with your Farm Environment Plans (FEP). This blog post looks at how an EM survey can help with identifying your soil types for your Farm Environment Plan.

An EM survey illustrates the relative variability in soil characteristics including soil texture that can be potentially related to water holding properties within that soil profile, this can help you manage water application through the use of variable rate irrigation technology. When combined with the use of soil moisture probes you have the data and technology you need to be able to retain nutrients within the soil profile itself. 

EM surveys can be ground-truthed to find the correlation between the EM value and water holding capacity (WHC).  From that you can create a WHC map and site-specifically place moisture probes to monitor the soil moisture levels within each identified zone.

Ground-truthing sites are identified within each zone (shown on the left). The graph illustrates the correlation between the EM values and WHC in the top 55cm of the soil profile for this paddock.
In the image above we can see the correlation between EM value and WHC at this site has an R2 of 0.97 (R2 quantifies goodness of fit. It is a fraction between 0.0 and 1.0, higher values indicate that the model fits the data better). We can then use the equation in VA Gateway, one of the PA software platforms supported by Agri Optics, to create a water holding capacity (WHC) map out of the EM values map.

The EM map converted into a Water Holding Capacity map
This water holding capacity map can then be used in conjunction with soil moisture probes and VRI to maintain the moisture levels between field capacity and critical moisture. This not only reduces any potential yield loss from moisture stress but it also ensures that you aren't saturating the soil profile, and therefore avoid leaching nutrients out of the root zone.

It’s all about balancing crop requirements, real-time moisture levels, rainfall (when it comes!) and application rates with irrigation return times as precisely as possible to keep everything at an optimum level.

An AquaCheck soil moisture probe graph showing soil moisture levels and how they are affected my irrigation or rain events on this soil profile.
As can be seen above by keeping the moisture between upper and lower readily available water levels you ensure yield isn’t compromised and eliminate leaching. The rooting depth used for the probe profile can be tailored to the crops specific needs on the moisture monitoring website.

Next time we will discuss how the EM maps and topography data can help you with your FEP.

Chris Smith

Agri Optics NZ Ltd

Wednesday, 4 November 2015

My Soil Moisture Sensors Are Spot On – Yeah Right!

There is a misconception that all soil (moisture) sensors are precise and tell you the exact soil moisture content.  Not so.  HydroServices runs a trial site where a number of soil moisture sensors are installed for comparison – for both the “calibrated” soil moisture content and any long term trends.  A boring looking trial site because the sensors are installed toward the small gap in the trees.  In all there are 8 sensors – neutron probe, Decagon 5TM and GS1, Acclima, AquaCheck and two (2) Aquaflex.  The Decagon 5TM, GS1 and Acclima sensors are installed at 10cm, the shallow Aquaflex on a slope from 10-25cm, and the neutron probe and AquaCheck can measure at 15 and 10cm respectively.


Sensors are provided with a factory calibration, usually one for silt loam, clay loam and sandy loam soil types.  These are generic and may or may not truly measure the soil moisture content at your location because (for example):
a)    Your soil is unlikely to be the same as the generic soil type;
b)    The sensor is poorly installed (especially if there is not perfect contact between the sensor and the soil); and
c)    The soil is loose (cultivated) and perfect contact is not possible

While the traces of soil moisture content are sort of similar, none (with their generic calibration) read the same soil moisture content, as shown in the plot of all sensors.  (Note the GS1 Sensor is a recent addition and no data is available for the dates compared).


The only sensor that has been calibrated against true soil moisture content (gravimetric laboratory analysis) is the neutron probe.  Knowing that Field Capacity at this location and soil type should be about 40%; only the neutron probe and Aquaflex measure soil moisture content at this level.  The other three sensors measure field capacity 10% less than the true field capacity. Disconcertedly two sensors measure soil moisture content between irrigation events (the vertical rise in the traces) at or very close to wilting point – approximately 17-18%.  This is not the case; the pasture never died nor showed any sign of being close to wilting point.

What is to be taken home from the comparison?  If you want sensible and realistic soil moisture measurements the sensors must be field calibrated.  The simplest and easiest way to field calibrate is by neutron probe – click on http://www.hydroservices.co.nz/index.php?option=com_content&view=featured&Itemid=308 for more details.

Tuesday, 13 October 2015

Good Old Spring Weather

In the past seven days we have had a bit of everything, 10 to 29 degree days, 100km per hour NW winds, rain through to hail and bitterly cold southerly winds reminding us that spring is upon us!


Whilst forecasters don’t always get the rainfall amounts correct, they are pretty accurate when it comes to predicting strong winds.  After the wind on Sunday, it only took two minutes after leaving home to see some damage caused by the strong NW winds.




With a long dry irrigation season predicted, a broken irrigator can take a long time to fix leading to reduced yields in crops and lost dry matter in pastures. This can be avoided by having a simple plan in place for windy conditions, whether it be securing pivots to a heavy roller or parking a Rotorainer in a sheltered position on the farm.

Rainfall
Measuring and recording rainfall through the season is also key, rain gauges are cheap and may help save valuable water, especially in the shoulder seasons.  Turning irrigators off for a couple of days here and there may not seem like it making a big difference at the time, but those days all count at the end of the season if water allocations are getting tight.



Weather forecasts
The forecasters are predicting cold and wet weather on Tuesday this week, perhaps an opportunity to save a round or two with the pivot if they are correct.

Happy Irrigating!

Mark Fitzgibbon
Hydroservices



Tuesday, 15 September 2015

EM Surveying and Water Holding Capacity

In recent weeks we’ve been through the calendar of EMSurveying, A day in the life of an EM Surveyor and The value in ground-truthing your EM Survey in amongst other informative posts from Lindsay NZ and HydroServices. This week we’re going to shed some light on how an EM Survey by Agri Optics can be used to evaluate water-holding capacity of the surveyed area.
Predominately our clients ask us to conduct an EM survey for them to determine the differences in their soils with a view to varying their irrigation depths on the different soil types; however we can adapt the EM Surveys for many different uses, one of these being to evaluate water-holding capacity variation.


The DualEM sensor works by emitting an electro-magnetic field into the soil and measuring the returning conductivity of the soil. The conductivity of the soil in New Zealand is affected mostly by soil texture and the amount of water the different soil textures can hold (the more water the soil can hold the more conductive it is). The readings can also be influenced by salinity, however other than a few isolated areas in NZ we don’t have an issue with salinity affecting the readings. 

Figure 1: DualEM sensor being trailed behind our light weight Polaris


To fully relate the EM readings to water holding capacity (WHC), ground-truthing is needed to quantify the actual WHC at different locations as the EM Survey only measures relative difference of one area compared to another. As we have mentioned in previous blogs we create a map of EM zones and within that locate sample sites for each zone to be ground-truthed. The ground-truthing is then carried out by typically HydroServices using their neutron probe and our agreed protocols. They then provide us with the water-holding capacities for each different depth. From this we then create a map of WHC variation across the surveyed and provide a report back to the client of these additional maps with description on correlations of WHC and EM and recommendations on how these maps would be used to implement more efficient irrigation.  

In addition to getting accurate WHC maps and the associated report back the client can also use the ground-truthing sites to help site soil moisture probes and if the probes are installed before the ground-truthing is completed, the ground-truthing reading can also be used as one of the field calibration readings for the soil moisture probes.  

Figure 2: Water-holding capacity map created from an EM map

All of this information helps the client get the most of their EM data and make efficient use of their water by matching the water to the different zones and then monitoring moisture levels with their moisture probes. If the 2015/16 season is going to be as dry as forecast then making every drop count will be crucial. We not only conduct the EM surveying we can now also provide our clients with AquaCheck soil moisture probes to help manage your irrigation as efficiently as possible. Visit our website or give Jemma or Chris a call to discuss any of the above.